I have a statistical point about recruiting. Patrick Bryant last year was about where Jordan Anderson is this year in terms of overall rank (1050 range) yet Anderson is about .01 lower on the star rank. Also, last year's class has about 33% above the 1050 range with this year's class 50% above that range. There is something more to dive into why the discrepancy would be wide between last year's class and this that doesn't have to do with small sample size. No one probably cares about this but seems like a miss on standardizing year over year equivalents which actually make our class look better.