I Take That Back
You have currently viewed 1 story this month.
IlliniBoard now offers two free stories per month, for more please subscribe.
When Penn State jumped out to an 11-2 lead, I tweeted "hovers over 'maybe we're just not that good?' button". When Brad Underwood called a timeout five minutes in with his team trailing 19-4, I tweeted the statistics so far at that very moment in the season. I wanted it on the record:
#8 preseason— Robert Rosenthal (@ALionEye) December 23, 2020
Two All American candidates
Picked by Big Ten media to win the B1G.
5-3 on the season, trailing interim-coached Penn State (who was picked 12th in that poll) 19-4.
And from that point forward, we outscored Penn State 94-62.
I tweeted a little later that I had discovered the exact low point of the season. 5-3 having lost three of four and losing this one 19-4... and now we won't reach a point that low for the rest of the season. Outscored Penn State 94-62 after that and now a run of 5 of the next 7 at home with the road games being the two teams picked 13th and 14th in the Big Ten before the season.
I've been hating life during this five-game stretch where we lost to Baylor, Missouri, and Rutgers. But then I go look at KenPom and after the Baylor game we were 24th in the country and now we're 7th. So the NERDstats are kind of screaming "nevermind these three losses - this team is rolling right now".
And it's rolling based on offensive efficiency. We see that in the stats (7th nationally in field goal percentage) and we see that in the NERDstats (5th nationally in offensive efficiency). I only dabble in the NERDstats, so this will be a little blunt for your statheads, but here's how I see that ("that" being "we're shooting at a high percentage and it feels somewhat sustainable").
- We're feeding the post, Kofi's post moves have improved, Giorgi's freshman moves have returned, and we're scoring at a fairly high percentage.
- Teams will adjust to this and it will open up more uncontested shots from the rest or the team.
- Ayo and Curbelo are getting to the rim. Shots are fairly easy at the rim.
- Ayo and Curbelo are also distributing the ball quite well. Lots of open threes this year - way more than last year.
So I see it in this "the good shots have increased significantly which is why our offensive statistics have improved so much" thing. And there was no better example of that than this game. Penn State shot the ball incredibly well. Maybe the best they'll shoot in the next five years. And we still pulled away and won by 17.
Let's just go through those statistics. Once the game was out of reach, Penn State missed their final eight shots. But up until that point, here are the statistics. I highlighted all of the two-point jumpers:
(I'm in a total fight against my heavy eyes at this point. After the game I drove to the Pittsburgh area to knock a couple hours off of tomorrow's drive. It's now 1:41 am and my eyes are HEAVY. But I'm going to knock this out.)
It was still a game with five minutes left. Illinois had an 82-74 lead. Why was it still a game? Because Penn State was shooting out of their minds. Here's the craziest stat:
In the first 35 minutes of the game, Penn State took 15 two-point jumpers. Not layups, not threes - two point jump shots. The thing every college defense is trying to force. Lower percentage of makes than around the rim, fewer points than a three pointer.
Of those 15 two-point jumpers they took, Penn State made THIRTEEN. 13 for 15. It was insane. I'd be willing to make a very sizable bet that Penn State does not shoot 13 for 15 on two-point jumpers in any stretch of any game for the next five years. Nobody besides Villanova in the 1985 NCAA title game makes that many jump shots. Who shoots 86% on JUMPERS?
Yet even with with their incredibly hot shooting, they still trailed 80-72 with five minutes remaining. How? Because our guards were getting to the rim with ease and either making the layup or getting fouled. (Or missing, watching Kofi get the rebound, and then watching Kofi dunk it.)
I was trying to think of the last time that happened. I remember games where the other team just can't miss, but I don't remember being comfortably in the lead while they kept hitting shot after shot. And I certainly can't remember a game where we shot 5-16 from three, the other team made 13 of 15 two-point jump shots, and we still won very comfortably.
The credit to that goes to, well, everyone. Let's make a really fast list before I fall asleep.
- Ayo was unstoppable. I wrote it all out on the piece of paper but I left it at the arena so I'll have to go by memory. I believe from the 10 minute mark to the 4 minute mark, Penn State was hitting shot after shot after shot and yet they couldn't dent our lead. Why? Because in those six minutes or so, Ayo scored 17 points.
- The key numbers for Andre Curbelo - 9-9-8. He was 9 for 9 at the free throw line and he dished out 8 assists. He's gonna be so good. (He's already so good.)
- Kofi was 11-13 for 23 points with a variety of post moves, putbacks, and dunks. The Penn State radio guys finished their postgame show and then started talking to each other about how Penn State has zero chance of stopping Kofi.
- Jacob Grandison was probably the player of the game, with 7 points and 7 rebounds. His hustle plays had the bench guys going insane.
- Giorgi only got 12 minutes but had 8 points on 4-5 shooting. More scoring in the lane, where points in the paint were 58-32 (!!).
Add it all up and.. I take back what I said. I don't need to press the "maybe we're not any good?" button. I don't need to mark the time where we're trailing 19-4 and wonder aloud what happened to the team we all expected. They showed up in a big way tonight (on the road) and now I can't wait to see what happens next.
No proofreading. Of to bed. Gonna dream of Ayo flying to the rim with ease again and again and again and again.